Minnesota Personal Injury Law Free Consultations Se Habla Español

Minnesota Injury Law Blog & Legal Insights

Practical guides and legal insights from Andrade Law. Learn about personal injury claims, insurance tactics, filing deadlines, and how to protect your rights after an accident in Minnesota.

MN Injury Case Watch

Minnesota Court Rulings, Explained

Plain-language case notes on recent Minnesota Court of Appeals decisions that shape injury claims — what happened, what the court held, and what it means for you.

Negligence & Duty of Care · Affirmed

Campion v. NCAA: Does a Concussion Plan Create a Legal Duty?

A former University of Minnesota offensive lineman argued the school’s concussion management plan created a legal duty to follow it. A divided court rejected that Section 323 theory — without deciding whether the plan was ever violated.

Read Case Note →

Emotional-Distress Damages · Affirmed

Pedersen v. ART: When Emotional Distress Alone Isn’t Enough

A fertility lab destroyed a couple’s stored sperm sample two weeks before the agreed date, yet their emotional-distress claim failed. Why Minnesota’s physical-injury rule barred recovery — and which questions the court left open.

Read Case Note →

Uninsured Motorist · Reversed & Remanded

Honcik v. American Family: UM Coverage When the Government Is Immune

In a published, precedential decision, the Court of Appeals held that a vehicle shielded by official immunity counts as uninsured — so an injured driver’s own UM coverage can step in. What changed, and what the court left open.

Read Case Note →

Uninsured Motorist · Affirmed

Higgins v. Brown: A $686,000 UM Verdict Survives Appeal

State Farm raised six arguments for a new trial after a jury valued an injured driver’s claim well above his policy limit. Why none of them succeeded — and what the ruling shows about preserving objections at trial.

Read Case Note →

Underinsured Motorist · Affirmed

Kissner v. Farm Bureau: Proving Wage Loss When You’re Self-Employed

A jury awarded $250,000 in lost wages; the courts erased it because no financial records backed the claim. Why testimony alone is rarely enough — and how a few hundred dollars of interest still preserved UIM coverage.

Read Case Note →

Filing Deadlines · Affirmed

Blackwell v. Cub Foods: A Federal Filing That Never Stopped the Clock

A store-injury claim was dismissed as time-barred even though the plaintiff had sued in federal court first. Why Minnesota’s service rules decide when an action is truly commenced — and when tolling never begins.

Read Case Note →

Negligent Supervision · Affirmed

Schafer v. Oakwood: Foreseeability Decides Youth-Program Injury Claims

A teenager was hurt at a church youth group after a spontaneous kicking game. Why the claim failed without evidence the harm was foreseeable — and what warning signs can change that analysis.

Read Case Note →

Civil Procedure · Affirmed

Evans v. Sunrise East: A Missed Deadline Ended This Injury Case

A slip-and-fall case dismissed under Rule 5.04’s one-year filing deadline stayed dismissed — the Court of Appeals refused to reopen it, and the appeal targeted the wrong order. Why deadlines can decide a case before the facts are ever heard.

Read Case Note →

Premises Liability · Affirmed

Odegaard v. 610 MOB Partners: Ice, Notice, and Proof

A winter slip-and-fall claim failed because no evidence showed how long the ice had been there or that the owner knew about it. What notice evidence carries these cases — and why documenting conditions early matters.

Read Case Note →

Medical Malpractice · Reversed in Part

Pitchford v. Hunter: Family’s Malpractice Case Reinstated

The Court of Appeals revived a family’s medical-malpractice claims, clarifying that section 145.682 expert affidavits are a procedural gate — not a requirement to prove the entire case before discovery begins.

Read Case Note →

Animal Injury · Affirmed

Eskew v. Luhmann: Owner Knowledge Decides Animal-Attack Claims

A farmhand seriously injured by a cow could not recover because nothing showed the owner knew this particular animal was dangerous. How Minnesota’s scienter rule differs from the dog-bite statute.

Read Case Note →

Need Legal Help?

Have Questions About Your Injury Case?

Last updated: